Ski-Doo RNGD X900 Acetbr RS1 25ES vs Ski-Doo RNGDADRLN900ACTBRRS1 25ES — Depreciation Comparison

Ski-Doo RNGD X900 Acetbr RS1 25ES vs Ski-Doo RNGDADRLN900ACTBRRS1 25ES: 5-year value retention (61% vs 61%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ski-Doo RNGD X900 Acetbr RS1 25ES holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Ski-Doo RNGD X900 Acetbr RS1 25ES comes out ahead, holding about 61% of its value versus 61% for the Ski-Doo RNGDADRLN900ACTBRRS1 25ES. Over the first five years the Ski-Doo RNGD X900 Acetbr RS1 25ES loses roughly $6,997 while the Ski-Doo RNGDADRLN900ACTBRRS1 25ES loses about $6,603 — a gap near $-394.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ski-Doo RNGD X900 Acetbr RS1 25ES sheds about 17% in year one versus 17% for the Ski-Doo RNGDADRLN900ACTBRRS1 25ES. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…