Arctic Cat Bearcat 7000 XT vs Ski-Doo RNGDADRLN900ACERS1 25ES: 5-year value retention (60% vs 60%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ski-Doo RNGDADRLN900ACERS1 25ES holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Ski-Doo RNGDADRLN900ACERS1 25ES comes out ahead, holding about 60% of its value versus 60% for the Arctic Cat Bearcat 7000 XT. Over the first five years the Ski-Doo RNGDADRLN900ACERS1 25ES loses roughly $5,340 while the Arctic Cat Bearcat 7000 XT loses about $5,811 — a gap near $471.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ski-Doo RNGDADRLN900ACERS1 25ES sheds about 17% in year one versus 8% for the Arctic Cat Bearcat 7000 XT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…