Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBRIRXT1 25ES vs Ski-Doo RNGDXRS900ACETBRIRXT1 5ES — Depreciation Comparison

Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBRIRXT1 25ES vs Ski-Doo RNGDXRS900ACETBRIRXT1 5ES: 5-year value retention (61% vs 61%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBRIRXT1 25ES holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBRIRXT1 25ES comes out ahead, holding about 61% of its value versus 61% for the Ski-Doo RNGDXRS900ACETBRIRXT1 5ES. Over the first five years the Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBRIRXT1 25ES loses roughly $7,136 while the Ski-Doo RNGDXRS900ACETBRIRXT1 5ES loses about $7,664 — a gap near $528.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBRIRXT1 25ES sheds about 17% in year one versus 17% for the Ski-Doo RNGDXRS900ACETBRIRXT1 5ES. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…