Ski-Doo RNGDXRS900ACETBRIRXT125ES vs Ski-Doo SMTXEXP165850PMXL3 0SHTTS: 5-year value retention (61% vs 61%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ski-Doo RNGDXRS900ACETBRIRXT125ES holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Ski-Doo RNGDXRS900ACETBRIRXT125ES comes out ahead, holding about 61% of its value versus 61% for the Ski-Doo SMTXEXP165850PMXL3 0SHTTS. Over the first five years the Ski-Doo RNGDXRS900ACETBRIRXT125ES loses roughly $7,586 while the Ski-Doo SMTXEXP165850PMXL3 0SHTTS loses about $7,780 — a gap near $194.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ski-Doo RNGDXRS900ACETBRIRXT125ES sheds about 17% in year one versus 16% for the Ski-Doo SMTXEXP165850PMXL3 0SHTTS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…