Mitzi Skiffs 15 CC FO vs Sportsman Masters 207 Sport CC: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mitzi Skiffs 15 CC FO holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Mitzi Skiffs 15 CC FO comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Sportsman Masters 207 Sport CC. Over the first five years the Mitzi Skiffs 15 CC FO loses roughly $4,713 while the Sportsman Masters 207 Sport CC loses about $23,801 — a gap near $19,088.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mitzi Skiffs 15 CC FO sheds about 18% in year one versus 11% for the Sportsman Masters 207 Sport CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…