Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 150 vs Sportsmobile R 161P Promaster — Depreciation Comparison

Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 150 vs Sportsmobile R 161P Promaster: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 150 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 150 comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Sportsmobile R 161P Promaster. Over the first five years the Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 150 loses roughly $42,819 while the Sportsmobile R 161P Promaster loses about $43,738 — a gap near $919.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 150 sheds about 17% in year one versus 17% for the Sportsmobile R 161P Promaster. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…