Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 250 vs Sportsmobile R 161T Transit 150 — Depreciation Comparison

Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 250 vs Sportsmobile R 161T Transit 150: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Sportsmobile R 161T Transit 150 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Sportsmobile R 161T Transit 150 comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 250. Over the first five years the Sportsmobile R 161T Transit 150 loses roughly $43,495 while the Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 250 loses about $43,357 — a gap near $-138.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Sportsmobile R 161T Transit 150 sheds about 17% in year one versus 17% for the Sportsmobile R 138T Transit 250. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…