Aluma Weld Xpress X19 Pro Xtrm TRL PK BS vs Starcraft 172 Fish — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress X19 Pro Xtrm TRL PK BS vs Starcraft 172 Fish: 5-year value retention (63% vs 63%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress X19 Pro Xtrm TRL PK BS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress X19 Pro Xtrm TRL PK BS comes out ahead, holding about 63% of its value versus 63% for the Starcraft 172 Fish. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress X19 Pro Xtrm TRL PK BS loses roughly $14,564 while the Starcraft 172 Fish loses about $8,317 — a gap near $-6247.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress X19 Pro Xtrm TRL PK BS sheds about 24% in year one versus 7% for the Starcraft 172 Fish. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…