Keystone Rv 240 URS vs Starcraft 212FB: 5-year value retention (49% vs 49%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Keystone Rv 240 URS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Keystone Rv 240 URS comes out ahead, holding about 49% of its value versus 49% for the Starcraft 212FB. Over the first five years the Keystone Rv 240 URS loses roughly $25,043 while the Starcraft 212FB loses about $20,756 — a gap near $-4287.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Keystone Rv 240 URS sheds about 17% in year one versus 23% for the Starcraft 212FB. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…