Starcraft Fishmaster 210 vs Tidewater 232 LXF — Depreciation Comparison

Starcraft Fishmaster 210 vs Tidewater 232 LXF: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Starcraft Fishmaster 210 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Starcraft Fishmaster 210 comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the Tidewater 232 LXF. Over the first five years the Starcraft Fishmaster 210 loses roughly $15,889 while the Tidewater 232 LXF loses about $28,502 — a gap near $12,613.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Starcraft Fishmaster 210 sheds about 21% in year one versus 9% for the Tidewater 232 LXF. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…