Avalon LSZ ENT 2285 vs Sylvan M3 CRS — Depreciation Comparison

Avalon LSZ ENT 2285 vs Sylvan M3 CRS: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Avalon LSZ ENT 2285 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Avalon LSZ ENT 2285 comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Sylvan M3 CRS. Over the first five years the Avalon LSZ ENT 2285 loses roughly $8,924 while the Sylvan M3 CRS loses about $37,540 — a gap near $28,616.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Avalon LSZ ENT 2285 sheds about 7% in year one versus 9% for the Sylvan M3 CRS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…