Avalon LS RF 2480 vs Tahoe LTZ QF 2285 — Depreciation Comparison

Avalon LS RF 2480 vs Tahoe LTZ QF 2285: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Avalon LS RF 2480 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Avalon LS RF 2480 comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the Tahoe LTZ QF 2285. Over the first five years the Avalon LS RF 2480 loses roughly $6,492 while the Tahoe LTZ QF 2285 loses about $7,517 — a gap near $1,025.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Avalon LS RF 2480 sheds about 7% in year one versus 7% for the Tahoe LTZ QF 2285. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…