Thor Motor Coach 22E GM 3500 vs Thor Motor Coach 35M Ford: 5-year value retention (49% vs 49%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Thor Motor Coach 22E GM 3500 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Thor Motor Coach 22E GM 3500 comes out ahead, holding about 49% of its value versus 49% for the Thor Motor Coach 35M Ford. Over the first five years the Thor Motor Coach 22E GM 3500 loses roughly $62,475 while the Thor Motor Coach 35M Ford loses about $113,909 — a gap near $51,434.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Thor Motor Coach 22E GM 3500 sheds about 31% in year one versus 29% for the Thor Motor Coach 35M Ford. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…