Tidewater 220 LXF vs Tracker Grizzly 1654 Sprtsmn: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Tidewater 220 LXF holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Tidewater 220 LXF comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the Tracker Grizzly 1654 Sprtsmn. Over the first five years the Tidewater 220 LXF loses roughly $21,601 while the Tracker Grizzly 1654 Sprtsmn loses about $4,199 — a gap near $-17402.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Tidewater 220 LXF sheds about 9% in year one versus 14% for the Tracker Grizzly 1654 Sprtsmn. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…