Tracker T16 vs Zodiac Pro 7 NEO: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Tracker T16 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Tracker T16 comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Zodiac Pro 7 NEO. Over the first five years the Tracker T16 loses roughly $8,053 while the Zodiac Pro 7 NEO loses about $22,713 — a gap near $14,660.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Tracker T16 sheds about 19% in year one versus 12% for the Zodiac Pro 7 NEO. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…