Lowe FM 1675 SC vs Tracker Z17 DC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FM 1675 SC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe FM 1675 SC comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Tracker Z17 DC. Over the first five years the Lowe FM 1675 SC loses roughly $7,723 while the Tracker Z17 DC loses about $10,664 — a gap near $2,941.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FM 1675 SC sheds about 15% in year one versus 16% for the Tracker Z17 DC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…