Lowe FM 1800 WT vs Tracker Z19 DC — Depreciation Comparison

Lowe FM 1800 WT vs Tracker Z19 DC: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FM 1800 WT holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lowe FM 1800 WT comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the Tracker Z19 DC. Over the first five years the Lowe FM 1800 WT loses roughly $9,027 while the Tracker Z19 DC loses about $14,491 — a gap near $5,464.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FM 1800 WT sheds about 15% in year one versus 16% for the Tracker Z19 DC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…