SeaArk RX170 SC vs Tracker Z19 Sport — Depreciation Comparison

SeaArk RX170 SC vs Tracker Z19 Sport: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. SeaArk RX170 SC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the SeaArk RX170 SC comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Tracker Z19 Sport. Over the first five years the SeaArk RX170 SC loses roughly $3,049 while the Tracker Z19 Sport loses about $10,441 — a gap near $7,392.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the SeaArk RX170 SC sheds about 8% in year one versus 6% for the Tracker Z19 Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…