Alumaweld X220 18 vs Tracker Z20 SC: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumaweld X220 18 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumaweld X220 18 comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Tracker Z20 SC. Over the first five years the Alumaweld X220 18 loses roughly $10,555 while the Tracker Z20 SC loses about $16,213 — a gap near $5,658.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumaweld X220 18 sheds about 15% in year one versus 11% for the Tracker Z20 SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…