Allmand 25 CC vs Alweld 1642 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg — Depreciation Comparison

Allmand 25 CC vs Alweld 1642 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Allmand 25 CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Allmand 25 CC comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the Alweld 1642 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg. Over the first five years the Allmand 25 CC loses roughly $7,988 while the Alweld 1642 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg loses about $1,273 — a gap near $-6715.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Allmand 25 CC sheds about 5% in year one versus 5% for the Alweld 1642 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…