Allmand Monster 32 CC vs Pioneer 180 Sportfish CC — Depreciation Comparison

Allmand Monster 32 CC vs Pioneer 180 Sportfish CC: 5-year value retention (64% vs 64%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Allmand Monster 32 CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Allmand Monster 32 CC comes out ahead, holding about 64% of its value versus 64% for the Pioneer 180 Sportfish CC. Over the first five years the Allmand Monster 32 CC loses roughly $26,049 while the Pioneer 180 Sportfish CC loses about $15,510 — a gap near $-10539.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Allmand Monster 32 CC sheds about 7% in year one versus 26% for the Pioneer 180 Sportfish CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…