Aluma Weld Xpress 1756VJ vs Lund 1600 Alaskan: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1600 Alaskan holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1600 Alaskan comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Aluma Weld Xpress 1756VJ. Over the first five years the Lund 1600 Alaskan loses roughly $9,747 while the Aluma Weld Xpress 1756VJ loses about $1,647 — a gap near $-8100.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1600 Alaskan sheds about 10% in year one versus 8% for the Aluma Weld Xpress 1756VJ. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…