Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 BS vs Skeeter ZX200 Dual Console — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 BS vs Skeeter ZX200 Dual Console: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 BS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 BS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Skeeter ZX200 Dual Console. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 BS loses roughly $8,145 while the Skeeter ZX200 Dual Console loses about $22,208 — a gap near $14,063.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 BS sheds about 21% in year one versus 21% for the Skeeter ZX200 Dual Console. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…