Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Duck Boat BS vs Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Duck Boat BS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Duck Boat BS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Duck Boat BS loses roughly $8,312 while the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS loses about $8,288 — a gap near $-24.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Duck Boat BS sheds about 21% in year one versus 21% for the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…