Aluma Weld Xpress X23B Marsh Pkg BS vs Lund 1600 Alaskan SS — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress X23B Marsh Pkg BS vs Lund 1600 Alaskan SS: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress X23B Marsh Pkg BS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress X23B Marsh Pkg BS comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress X23B Marsh Pkg BS loses roughly $18,008 while the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS loses about $10,700 — a gap near $-7308.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress X23B Marsh Pkg BS sheds about 27% in year one versus 11% for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…