Aluma Weld Xpress X23B vs Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress X23B vs Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Aluma Weld Xpress X23B. Over the first five years the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC loses roughly $3,961 while the Aluma Weld Xpress X23B loses about $15,669 — a gap near $11,708.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC sheds about 8% in year one versus 28% for the Aluma Weld Xpress X23B. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…