Aluma Weld Xpress XP185 Catfish BS vs G3 17CC Camo — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress XP185 Catfish BS vs G3 17CC Camo: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress XP185 Catfish BS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress XP185 Catfish BS comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the G3 17CC Camo. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress XP185 Catfish BS loses roughly $8,110 while the G3 17CC Camo loses about $9,291 — a gap near $1,181.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress XP185 Catfish BS sheds about 21% in year one versus 13% for the G3 17CC Camo. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…