Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS vs Lund 1650 Angler Tiller: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lund 1650 Angler Tiller. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS loses roughly $6,995 while the Lund 1650 Angler Tiller loses about $8,720 — a gap near $1,725.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS sheds about 21% in year one versus 23% for the Lund 1650 Angler Tiller. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…