Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS vs Mako 414 CC — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS vs Mako 414 CC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Mako 414 CC. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS loses roughly $6,995 while the Mako 414 CC loses about $201,722 — a gap near $194,727.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC Bay Stnls PK BS sheds about 21% in year one versus 8% for the Mako 414 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…