Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS vs Lund 1400 Fury: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lund 1400 Fury. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS loses roughly $8,890 while the Lund 1400 Fury loses about $5,953 — a gap near $-2937.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS sheds about 21% in year one versus 24% for the Lund 1400 Fury. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…