Alumacraft MV 1860 AW CC vs Dusky 227 CC: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft MV 1860 AW CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW CC comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Dusky 227 CC. Over the first five years the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW CC loses roughly $3,703 while the Dusky 227 CC loses about $14,175 — a gap near $10,472.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW CC sheds about 8% in year one versus 24% for the Dusky 227 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…