Alumacraft Water Fowler 16 vs Smoker Craft 162 Pro Angler XL — Depreciation Comparison

Alumacraft Water Fowler 16 vs Smoker Craft 162 Pro Angler XL: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Water Fowler 16 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Water Fowler 16 comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Smoker Craft 162 Pro Angler XL. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Water Fowler 16 loses roughly $1,983 while the Smoker Craft 162 Pro Angler XL loses about $7,433 — a gap near $5,450.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Water Fowler 16 sheds about 7% in year one versus 27% for the Smoker Craft 162 Pro Angler XL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…