Alumaweld 22 vs SeaArk BC 190: 5-year value retention (78% vs 78%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumaweld 22 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumaweld 22 comes out ahead, holding about 78% of its value versus 78% for the SeaArk BC 190. Over the first five years the Alumaweld 22 loses roughly $10,781 while the SeaArk BC 190 loses about $6,780 — a gap near $-4001.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumaweld 22 sheds about 15% in year one versus 11% for the SeaArk BC 190. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…