Alweld 1756 Mud vs H2O Sports 17 DF CC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1756 Mud holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1756 Mud comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the H2O Sports 17 DF CC. Over the first five years the Alweld 1756 Mud loses roughly $2,740 while the H2O Sports 17 DF CC loses about $3,626 — a gap near $886.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1756 Mud sheds about 15% in year one versus 6% for the H2O Sports 17 DF CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…