Alweld 1760FV Mud vs Lowe 1760: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1760FV Mud holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1760FV Mud comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Lowe 1760. Over the first five years the Alweld 1760FV Mud loses roughly $3,087 while the Lowe 1760 loses about $5,797 — a gap near $2,710.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1760FV Mud sheds about 10% in year one versus 16% for the Lowe 1760. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…