Alumacraft Competitor 175 CS vs Alweld 1960 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Competitor 175 CS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Competitor 175 CS comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Alweld 1960 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Competitor 175 CS loses roughly $5,066 while the Alweld 1960 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg loses about $2,818 — a gap near $-2248.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Competitor 175 CS sheds about 8% in year one versus 18% for the Alweld 1960 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…