Alweld 1960VVSC Bay vs Polar Kraft 186 CC: 5-year value retention (81% vs 81%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1960VVSC Bay holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1960VVSC Bay comes out ahead, holding about 81% of its value versus 81% for the Polar Kraft 186 CC. Over the first five years the Alweld 1960VVSC Bay loses roughly $2,261 while the Polar Kraft 186 CC loses about $4,184 — a gap near $1,923.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1960VVSC Bay sheds about 4% in year one versus 4% for the Polar Kraft 186 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…