Arctic Cat Blast ZR 4000 vs CFMoto 300NK: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Cat Blast ZR 4000 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Cat Blast ZR 4000 comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the CFMoto 300NK. Over the first five years the Arctic Cat Blast ZR 4000 loses roughly $4,046 while the CFMoto 300NK loses about $1,827 — a gap near $-2219.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Cat Blast ZR 4000 sheds about 16% in year one versus 19% for the CFMoto 300NK. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…