Arctic Cat ZR 200 vs Kymco Mongoose 270: 5-year value retention (55% vs 55%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kymco Mongoose 270 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Kymco Mongoose 270 comes out ahead, holding about 55% of its value versus 55% for the Arctic Cat ZR 200. Over the first five years the Kymco Mongoose 270 loses roughly $1,743 while the Arctic Cat ZR 200 loses about $2,537 — a gap near $794.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kymco Mongoose 270 sheds about 9% in year one versus 23% for the Arctic Cat ZR 200. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…