Arctic Fox 25R vs Cherokee By Forest River 264DBH — Depreciation Comparison

Arctic Fox 25R vs Cherokee By Forest River 264DBH: 5-year value retention (53% vs 53%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 25R holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 25R comes out ahead, holding about 53% of its value versus 53% for the Cherokee By Forest River 264DBH. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 25R loses roughly $30,031 while the Cherokee By Forest River 264DBH loses about $22,181 — a gap near $-7850.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 25R sheds about 29% in year one versus 13% for the Cherokee By Forest River 264DBH. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…