Arctic Fox 28F vs Wildwood By Forest River 30KQBSS — Depreciation Comparison

Arctic Fox 28F vs Wildwood By Forest River 30KQBSS: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 28F holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 28F comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the Wildwood By Forest River 30KQBSS. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 28F loses roughly $35,113 while the Wildwood By Forest River 30KQBSS loses about $16,011 — a gap near $-19102.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 28F sheds about 29% in year one versus 9% for the Wildwood By Forest River 30KQBSS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…