Arctic Fox 29 5T vs Keystone Rv 335 CG: 5-year value retention (53% vs 53%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 29 5T holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 29 5T comes out ahead, holding about 53% of its value versus 53% for the Keystone Rv 335 CG. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 29 5T loses roughly $49,600 while the Keystone Rv 335 CG loses about $33,077 — a gap near $-16523.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 29 5T sheds about 34% in year one versus 18% for the Keystone Rv 335 CG. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…