Arctic Fox 29L vs Keystone Rv 3950 BR: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 29L holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 29L comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Keystone Rv 3950 BR. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 29L loses roughly $18,906 while the Keystone Rv 3950 BR loses about $32,751 — a gap near $13,845.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 29L sheds about 6% in year one versus 6% for the Keystone Rv 3950 BR. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…