Arctic Fox 32A vs Cherokee By Forest River 26RL L: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 32A holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 32A comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the Cherokee By Forest River 26RL L. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 32A loses roughly $37,295 while the Cherokee By Forest River 26RL L loses about $27,411 — a gap near $-9884.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 32A sheds about 29% in year one versus 29% for the Cherokee By Forest River 26RL L. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…