Arctic Fox 865 vs Flagstaff By Forest River 29SCHW: 5-year value retention (63% vs 63%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 865 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 865 comes out ahead, holding about 63% of its value versus 63% for the Flagstaff By Forest River 29SCHW. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 865 loses roughly $23,416 while the Flagstaff By Forest River 29SCHW loses about $11,702 — a gap near $-11714.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 865 sheds about 33% in year one versus 10% for the Flagstaff By Forest River 29SCHW. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…