Atc 2513 vs Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ — Depreciation Comparison

Atc 2513 vs Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ: 5-year value retention (59% vs 59%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Atc 2513 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Atc 2513 comes out ahead, holding about 59% of its value versus 59% for the Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ. Over the first five years the Atc 2513 loses roughly $65,571 while the Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ loses about $8,063 — a gap near $-57508.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Atc 2513 sheds about 27% in year one versus 8% for the Coleman By Dutchmen 17FQ. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…