Bigfoot Rv 25B 17 5G vs Starcraft 339BHTS — Depreciation Comparison

Bigfoot Rv 25B 17 5G vs Starcraft 339BHTS: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Bigfoot Rv 25B 17 5G holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Bigfoot Rv 25B 17 5G comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the Starcraft 339BHTS. Over the first five years the Bigfoot Rv 25B 17 5G loses roughly $12,431 while the Starcraft 339BHTS loses about $11,340 — a gap near $-1091.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Bigfoot Rv 25B 17 5G sheds about 6% in year one versus 6% for the Starcraft 339BHTS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…