Bullsbay 2400 CC vs Lund 1760 Predator: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Bullsbay 2400 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Bullsbay 2400 CC comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the Lund 1760 Predator. Over the first five years the Bullsbay 2400 CC loses roughly $25,310 while the Lund 1760 Predator loses about $9,299 — a gap near $-16011.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Bullsbay 2400 CC sheds about 25% in year one versus 11% for the Lund 1760 Predator. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…