Cape Horn 22OS CC vs H2O Sports 160 CC — Depreciation Comparison

Cape Horn 22OS CC vs H2O Sports 160 CC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Cape Horn 22OS CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Cape Horn 22OS CC comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the H2O Sports 160 CC. Over the first five years the Cape Horn 22OS CC loses roughly $35,633 while the H2O Sports 160 CC loses about $3,708 — a gap near $-31925.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Cape Horn 22OS CC sheds about 24% in year one versus 6% for the H2O Sports 160 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…