Cape Horn 34XS CC vs SeaArk Predator 220AK CC — Depreciation Comparison

Cape Horn 34XS CC vs SeaArk Predator 220AK CC: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Cape Horn 34XS CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Cape Horn 34XS CC comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the SeaArk Predator 220AK CC. Over the first five years the Cape Horn 34XS CC loses roughly $130,008 while the SeaArk Predator 220AK CC loses about $12,991 — a gap near $-117017.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Cape Horn 34XS CC sheds about 25% in year one versus 8% for the SeaArk Predator 220AK CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…